The first and most important thing we need to say is that pros can make hugely different amounts of money. It all depends on the individual, their performance and other value metrics like popularity.
It’s totally possible that some pros make less than 6 figures while others are earning millions, so you can treat this as a bit of a disclaimer that not every pro will match up perfectly with our estimates. We’re really gonna focus on the different methods that pros use to make money, then we’ll shift the perspective a bit and look at how the more popular pro players increase that amount to reach the real high-tier salaries. The first and most important revenue stream we want to talk about is team-based salary, which makes up the majority of a pro player’s income. This is also where you’ll find the most variance, since this amount is based on a contract, and there’s a few different things that come into play when it comes to figuring out how expensive that contract is going to be for the organisation. The obvious factors are things like that player’s skill level or how popular they are with the League community, but location plays a huge part too. Different regions offer different salaries, and organisations will often pay a higher sum to incentivize players to move to a different region. For example, Korean player Impact was apparently offered a place on the SKT T1 Roster, but rejected it to sign with Team Liquid for approximately $1 million dollars a year according to the ESPN eSports podcast between Rachel Gu and Jacob Wolf. This is of course a super high-tier salary and definitely way above the average, but it definitely goes to show how much higher a salary can be offered to encourage players to stay in one particular region over the other. The highest salaries in the world are typically found in China. The same podcast that we heard the rumors about Impact’s salary also claimed that Looper, the South Korean Top Laner for Royal Never Give Up, was earning $750,000 last year on this website. At the time, this was higher than any player salary in North America, although the gap has definitely been closing and NA is a clear cut second place for player salaries, to the point where EU has been reportedly struggling to compete with NA bids. Surprisingly, Korea is on average the region with the lowest salaries. In fact, an investigation into player salaries in 2015 by the Korea e-Sports Association (or Kespa as most of you will know it) found that the average salary of 40 League of Legends players across the 8 Kespa teams was $57,717. This average will have definitely increased since then, but it just goes to show how not every pro player in the world is in a position where they can think about early retirement! In fact, this was one of the motivating factors in Immortals CEO Noah Whinston pushing for a public database that tracked player salaries. With everything done behind closed doors, it’s entirely possible that many players were being exploited, especially since there are no player agents and no union. As you can see from these examples so far, the range of salaries for pro players is pretty massive. Lower tier pros can typically expect to earn around $50-80k a year, with the more notable LCS players reaching around $150-300k. Beyond that you’re really getting into the seriously noteworthy player bracket where their insane skill or popularity can easily push a player’s value up from anywhere between $700k and millions of dollars. It’s worth keeping in mind that franchising is actually going to push these salaries even higher, with all pro players and even academy pros being able to do really well for themselves depending on the team. Salaries are also going to become a lot more consistent, since organisations are going to be held accountable so they can’t get away with not paying their players. According to Goldenglue, most players don’t get any of the money directly from Riot stipends, team sponsors or promotional events since it’s just a part of their contracted salary. However, some players do get a percentage of merchandise revenue if it’s using their brand, like on jersey sales for example, so popular players could potentially earn a little extra here. One other factor worth considering here is performance-based bonuses. A lot of pro players contracts have stipulations where they are granted bonuses based on their success. This is typically done based on how much perceived risk there is to sign a player; so you could sign a player with a less pricy yearly salary, meaning less risk for the organisation, but strong showings from that player will give them bonuses and a potentially huge salary if they do well. One notable example of this is Reignover, who is cited as the highest salary in the NA LCS with a $350,000 contract. Compared to other high-tier salaries this might not seem THAT extreme, but Reignover’s performance bonuses could ramp up to a solid $700-800k extra in a single year, which would easily push him into the very top percentage of pro player salaries. I know what you’re all thinking at this point; how much does Faker make? According to Dot eSports, the world’s best player is apparently earning a cool $2.5 million dollars for 2017. That might sound like an absolutely insane sum of money, but compared to the other highest-paid athletes it’s still a pretty humble amount. That just goes to show that despite all the crazy growth in the eSports industry, it still has a long way to go before it competes with established sports that have been around for such a long time. The next revenue stream we should definitely discuss is personal content, such as Youtube videos or Twitch streams. This is pretty easy to estimate because it uses very similar metrics to other content creators. Most of the money here comes selling advertisement space on content or gaining subscribers on Twitch. Dot eSports estimated Bjergsen’s content income in 2015 to be around 20-40k a month, not including his Youtube, which is likely to be negligible compared to his streams so we’d be surprised to hear it earns more than 5k a month. Bjergsen serves as a pretty good baseline for estimating other pro player’s earnings from content. It really all boils down to how many people watch your content, so people with similar viewership will earn similar amounts, and that will scale up or down in a pretty linear fashion based on any particularly player’s popularity. Bjergsen might be the most popular NA LCS streamer, but he doesn’t stream as often as other players and can be pretty inconsistent with content. Working as content creators, pro players can really only maximize their earnings during the off-season when SoloQ is sufficient as a practice tool. Most pros we’ve talked to say that streaming Solo Queue is nowhere near as good practice as simply playing SoloQ off stream though, since they can dedicate more of their attention to streaming, so you can also consider personal content to be a pretty seasonal income stream. Still, it can definitely line the pockets of pro players in a significant way if they are dedicated to it. The most popular pros are likely pulling in $50k or more a month on this kinda stuff if they have high viewership and stream frequently, but the less popular players are likely still reaching a good $5-10k a month which is still a substantial amount of money, especially for a side income. There’s also tournament winnings to consider, with prize pools being typically split as 15% for players and 10% for the organization and coaching staff according to Goldenglue. Although events like MSI, Worlds and the LCS splits can have pretty sizable prize pools, it’s important to remember that it’s going to be split between a whole bunch of people, so it ends up being a generally low source of income for professional players. If you consider how much work a pro needs to put in to reach the final and win a tournament, only receiving 10-15% of the prize pool is a pretty low sum, so it’s not really a reliable income source for those planning their careers as pro gamers. Using Faker as an example, according to estimates by the site eSports Earnings, he’s earned $1,160,286.36 from 38 different tournaments since he started his career in Season 3. That’s less than half of his approximate salary for 2017 alone, so any budding professional players amongst you should definitely be looking to land a good contract rather than expecting to be rich from tournament winnings! There are a few other extraneous income sources out there that professional League players can take advantage of, but in all honesty they are probably insignificant compared to the other revenue streams. Riot skins like the World Championship team skins do have a revenue share, and there’s also stuff like team events or coaching that players can do on the side to earn a bit of extra income. Goldenglue commented that although some players do make guides or coach others for that small income boost, it’s not really a common thing among pro players and it’s usually not a particularly substantial amount. Original Article: https://ipo-merge.com/how-much-do-league-of-legends-pros-make/
0 Comments
So the Supreme Court decided to not take the case right now, maybe later … … and then America used some political leverage to get New York to agree to settle the matter privately with New Jersey. So the two states haggled: New Jersey gave up her claims to Staten Island and in return… … New York agreed New Jersey's northern border extended into the river and down the middle… … past Ellis Island, past Liberty Island... ... squeezing around Staten Island before going back out to sea. Ah hah!
So the Statue of Liberty is in New Jersey! No, New Jersey also gave up Ellis Island and Liberty Island too. Which seems like giving up a lot, but look, river access in the age of steam boats was a big deal https://casinoslots.sg/live-dealer-casinos. And sacrificing a couple islands to get her piers back was worth it. And America was happy because a power struggle between her and the states was averted. And everything was going to be smooth sailing… Ohhhhhh....... Uh, anyway, both islands are New York enclaves inside New Jersey's border. Which does make answering the question "Where is the Statue of Liberty?" … … with "In New Jersey" technically correct in the most pointless kind of way. Now in the midst of all this, America noticed Liberty Island's rather strategic position… … and she took it for herself as federal land and built a pretty star fortress upon it that could shoot in every direction. Look familiar? Later when France sent America the Statue of Liberty as a symbol of their eternal friendship … (A bond forged side-by-side in the heat of the young rebel's battle for freedom from the Empire … … a bond America would surely "hashtag" never forget.) … America said: "I will put it right here where it will be the first thing everyone coming to the United States will see! BFFs, France! BFFs, forever." So the statue was put atop an old Federal Fort on Federal Land and, pow, made a National Monument. So America owns the statue? This opens a book titled “What is Federal Land, like what does it mean? for real though?”. Which will be firmly closed as a story for another time otherwise we will never finish this. It's still only the 60s and we have yet to talk about the squabble over the land below the water... yesreally. So back to Ellis Island for a moment. Which, a hundred and fifty years after borders were supposedly settled, New Jersey claimed as hers again, partly. See: in the 1800s the island was yay big, but by the 1990s, it was *yay* big. And because the rivalries of youth never really end, New Jersey again brought in the Supreme Court. This time New York showed up promptly. The added land, New Jersey said, was hers. New York disagreed saying the embiggened island was still her island. Now, how did Ellis island get bigger? Well New York claimed while digging up the subways she dumped the dirt, uh, here. In New Jersey's half of the river. But her dirt = her new land, which is an interesting territorial acquisition strategy. But neither New York nor New Jersey could find any paperwork for the court to prove where the land came from. So how Ellis Island grew three sizes is just lost to history. But whatever. The court ruled everything above the water was New York … … and everything below the water was New Jersey. But if below became above, New New Jersey it would be. And thus this island belongs to New Jersey with just this little original part being New York. Which is a sublime and ridiculous border that opens the door to one squabble remaining. Liberty Island was originally yay but now it's *yay*. Which, means, this part should be New Jersey, not New York. Though it hasn't been fought over yet, (possibly because neither state has noticed)… … and while it would still leave Lady Liberty on the New York side.… … you know what would be on the New Jersey side? The Gift Shop. And the only thing more important than who owns the monument… … is who owns the gift shop for the monument. We will see. But as it is, within the waters of New Jersey, there's an island of New York … … that's federal land...atop which the national monument of the Statue of Liberty stands. [music] Oh, there's also Shooter's island. The State border runs... right through it. I’m not sure anyone noticed. Uhh... it's a bird sanctuary run by New York, so whatever. Who owns the Statue of Liberty? New York or New Jersey? It should be straight forward, but the island upon which the statue stands, Liberty Island… … has been part of a long fight between the states over their river border… … and the islands between them, … … with rounds in the 90s, the 80s, the 30s (the 1830s) and possibly more beyond 2000.
But to understand we must first go back to the 1600s. New Netherland was minding her own business, when England using bigger-navy diplomacy made the Dutch colony hers. Here the trouble begins, for England split New Netherland in twain, but not cleanly. The mess wasn't entirely England's fault. She was far away and maps in the 1600s, while they weren't bad, they weren't good either. Thus, the charter splitting New Netherlands reads [*clears throat*]: … "THIS INDENTURE made the four and twentieth day of June, in the sixteenth year of... [*mumbles*] ... ...Whereas... by Letters under Patents of the Great Seal of England, bearing date on or about the twelfth day of... ... [duhduhduhduhduh... OK, OK], did... give and grant... … all that tract of land... belonging to the westward of Long Island, and Manhitas Island… … and bounded on the east part by the main sea, and part by Hudson's river... … which said tract of land is hereafter to be called by the name... of... … New Caeserea? Or New Jersey.” You pick. Ugh, hoo-boy is this not an easy read. Paragraph breaks, England, you should try them. This charter has uncertainty about the names of everything, wrong latitude and longitude numbers, and incomplete descriptions of the rivers. It's all a vague mess. For example, is this part of the Hudson river, or not? The charter doesn’t say. And "bounded on the east" but where? And there's another part about "several other islands" but, which islands exactly? Like, say Ellis Island and Liberty Island? England said, whatever, your problem now and left the young colonies to three hundred years of squabbling. New Jersey said the Hudson flowed out to sea, and her border ran down the middle of the river,… … like it does in every other colonial charter, and thus the islands Staten, Ellis, and Liberty were hers. But New York, the Empire State, disagreed. The Hudson river? Flows roundward then onward. These islands? New York. And also the river, the whole river, and the piers you've built into the river. All New York. All belong to us. New Jersey didn't agree, but when borders are vague, bigger stick diplomacy rules. And with the wealthy and powerful city of New Amster-- er... New York at the heart of the conflict, … … New York got what New York wanted. When New Caeser-- er... New Jersey asked: "Why don't we split the river?" New York asked: "Why don't you make me?" And also: "Where are my taxes from those piers?" And also: “This island is a small pox quarantine now." And also: "Stop hitting yourself." By 1832, New Jersey had enough and called in the teacher, er... Supreme Court. New York didn't show up -- saying the court had no authority to settle a disagreement between the states. Which sounds crazy now but was kind of an unsettled question at the time. Because America was having power struggles with unruly states then… … and New York blowing off the Supreme Court wasn't helping. Worse: if the Supreme Court ruled New York must share her borders (which seemed likely) … … New York would comply... whoops, NO, New York was going to tell the court to get bent. America, trying to grow up to be a powerful federal goverment, did not want this. They recommended a less harsh punishment than people who didn't read the paragraph on neuroscience, five years instead of ten years. The people who read the neuroscientific passages reminding you or telling you that human behaviour is ultimately mechanistic, those people were less inclined to add on those extra punishment sentences. Another set of studies done by Lisa Aspinwall and colleagues presented judges in the United States with evidence concerning a murderer who seems to be a psychopath, and they gave them evidence about how this person's behaviour is shaped by their genes and they're shaped by the person's brain, and the finding was that judges ended up shaving off a bit of the sentence that they would hypothetically give.
They saw this scientific evidence as mitigating in a way. So, it's not just ordinary people who have this response, it's professional lawmakers, including professional judges. Now, again, the scientific research doesn't tell you whether this is good or bad, it's this shift of where you understand the human mind, the human behaviour in mechanistic terms, and it makes you less retributive. Narrator: So, given what neuroscience has already revealed about the human brain and criminal behaviour, what can the justice system do to benefit from the new research? Eagleman says that if we really want to rehabilitate criminals, we should start by looking at the effectiveness of prisons. Jail is the original rewire your brain solution. In other words, it's meant to punish people so that they say, well, that was a really bad experience, changes their brain, changes their cost benefit analyses so that they don't do it again, and for some people that works. It's simply that doesn't work across the society because people end up there for very different reasons. It tends not to work with drug addiction. It certainly doesn't work with mental illness. We now have drug courts, where people who are arrested for using and abusing, are addicted to drugs, go to special sentencing, get special things. So, the system is already recognizing that there's many people who have different problems, different brains, and giving them different types of sanctions. And so in other cases there is new things that come up all the time, as we learn, for example, about fetal alcohol syndrome, or posttraumatic stress disorder, you know, from non-combat things, people are, like, well we should take these things into consideration when we decide how to sentence somebody, because if we can treat the underlying problems, then we can help to reduce the chances that they'll do it again. Narrator: Eagleman says as the neuroscience improves, criminal behaviour that we don't understand now may in the future become just another treatable condition. It used to be that somebody with epilepsy or schizophrenia or depression, the idea was we can just beat it out of them, or talk them out of it, but as we've evolved in the sciences, we've realized that these are biological issues. So there's this spectrum about what we can measure, and at any moment in history there's a line drawn by our technology where if you're on this side of the line we say, oh, poor guy, it's not really your fault, you had a brain tumour, you had a brain injury, if you're on this side of the line we say, well, it's clearly your fault because we can't measure anything. Here's the issue: As our technology evolves, that line is gonna keep moving, we'll be able to measure new kinds of things and we'll have new names for new disorders that don't even exist now, so that puts us in this very strange situation where our current technology steers our intuitions about somebody's guilt or their culpability, and I think it can't be a just system that decides somebody's culpability based on whether we can measure and we have a name for it or not. Narrator: Many neuroscientists believe that the more we learn about the brain and criminal behaviour, the more the justice system will be forced to change, placing greater emphasis on treatment and rehabilitation for those whose brains made them do it. I believe the neuroscience is gonna help us develop better outcomes for everyone, and but it will also help us understand why individuals make bad decisions in a different way, complementary but in a different way than we view today. Let’s visit the Chinese territory of Macau— to see how how rich mainlanders are getting their money out of China. Welcome back to China Uncensored. I’m Chris Chappell. You know what’s great about being a Chinese millionaire? Apparently, not being in China.
Nearly half of China’s wealthy want to get out of the country. But before they move out, they first want to get their money out. And one of the many ways they do that is through the city of Macau. Macau is home to the world’s most elaborate casinos, as you know from James Bond. Wait, what’s that Shelley? That scene wasn't filmed in Macau? It was done at Pinewood Studios in the UK? What’s next, are you going to tell me James Bond himself isn’t a regenerating time lord who changes his face every three to seven movies? I feel so lied to. Anyway, Macau is here, in southern China. It’s just across the water from Hong Kong navigate to this website. Macau is part of China’s “One Country, Two Systems” policy. So Macau has its own government, currency, and laws— but it still belongs to the People’s Republic of China. It’s like Hong Kong, but the good kid version. You know, the obedient kid who listens to your anti-subversion laws and does the chores l like laundering your money. But anyway, Macau was a Portuguese colony for four hundred years. But eventually the Portuguese got tired of being the only colonial power left in Asia and returned Macau to China in 1999. It was two years after the Hong Kong handover, and there was much less fanfare. The good news is, when the Portuguese went away, they left their egg tarts behind. Gambling had been a part of Macau since the 1800s. And after the 1999 handover, it became the only place in China where casino gambling is legal. It’s also the only place in China where komodo dragons roam free in dangerously open pits, as you know from James Bond. Anyway, the real Macau is in fact home to elaborate casinos, more than 30 of them. Most of them have been built up in the last 15 years. But instead of looking like exotic fantasies of the East, the real casinos actually look like… exotic fantasies of the West. Macau is basically Las Vegas on steroids. In 2016, Macau’s casino gambling revenue was $28 billion, which is three times more than Las Vegas. And a lot of that money is coming from— you guessed it— Chinese millionaires. 80% of Macau’s tax revenue is from the gambling industry. And I’m not talking just about the 30 million ordinary Chinese tourists each year who go there just to gamble for fun. The majority of Macau’s gambling revenue actually comes from a small number of mainland Chinese gamblers referred to as VIP clients. These VIP clients are China’s wealthy elite who go there largely to get their money out of China. In recent years, the Chinese government has put restrictions on how much money citizens can move out of China: You can only transfer the equivalent of fifty thousand US dollars a year. So if you’re rich and want to move, say, a million yuan, which is three times the limit, you need to find a way around that. Fortunately, China’s wealthy have become experts at getting around laws. I mean, how do you think they became wealthy in the first place? Enter: the Macau casino industry. Here’s how it works. The casinos work with organizations called junkets. Imagine a junket like a cross between a bank and a promotion company, but often run by guys with shaved heads and neck tattoos. And the junkets promise casinos that they’ll bring them VIP clients. So let’s say you’re one of these VIP clients: a Chinese millionaire who got your money from, you know, totally legitimate sources completely unrelated to corruption. So there’s a casino. And it hires the junket on commission. The junket hires an agent inside mainland China. That agent finds you, and sells you a VIP package for one million yuan. That VIP package might include transportation, a free luxury hotel room, plus a million yuan worth of “free” casino chips that just happen to be included as a bonus. This way, you’re technically paying for the package, not the chips. That makes it legal. But there’s a catch: Those casino chips cannot be exchanged for cash. They’re called non-negotiable chips, or rolling chips. You actually have to travel to the casino in Macau and gamble all of them. But any chips you win back, well, those will be negotiable chips. Which you can exchange for cash. So once you’ve spent enough time gambling that you’ve wagered all your non-negotiable chips and hopefully won back most of them or more in negotiable chips, you can go cash them in for any currency you want— like US dollars— and then do whatever you please with that money. You won that money fair and square... outside mainland China! No more 50-thousand-dollar transfer limits. So you can invest your new winnings in a sensible, diverse portfolio— or blow it all on one wild party... with a hot tub, in a limousine, on a yacht, on a much larger yacht. Or buy high-end real estate in New York City. Anyway, Chinese millionaires love the Macau junket system. The junkets give them fancy hotel rooms for free, and set them up to gamble in beautiful casino VIP rooms like this. The favorite game of VIPs is baccarat. And not just because they’ve seen it in James Bond movies. It’s because baccarat has lowest chance of losing money compared with other games. I mean, statistically you’ll still lose over time— but it’s less than 3% on average. But if you play blackjack or roulette, you’ll lose much more than that over time. So a lot of gamblers just stick with baccarat, and just consider it a small fee to turn Chinese yuan into any currency they want. Plus they get a swanky hotel room and the VIP treatment. Now you might think this whole system of gambling and shady junkets is just a way for corrupt officials to launder money and skirt the currency transfer laws. And you’d be right. That’s EXACTLY what it is. So...then why doesn’t the Chinese Communist Party just shut it down? I mean, on one hand, corrupt officials are using it to move money out of China without technically breaking the law. This makes it harder for Xi Jinping to go after them with his anti-corruption campaign. Plus on a large scale it sucks money out of the Chinese economy. But, on the other hand, VIP clients are a huge part of Macau’s economy. Macau’s gambling and tourism industries would pretty much collapse without them. And the CCP doesn’t want that to happen either. There are a lot of well-connected Party officials who directly profit from Macau. And from a bigger picture, Macau is supposed to be the shining example of how your economy will be great after you give up control of your territory to the People’s Republic of China— hint, hint, Taiwan. But if the VIP money stops rolling through, it will be pretty obvious that the entire system is a corrupt sham— and that would be a huge embarrassment for the Party. So the CCP is between a rock and a hard place. It’s like when you fall into a pit, and on one hand there’s a komodo dragon that wants to eat you, but on the other hand you can’t escape because there’s a gangster trying to kill you. I guess there’s no way out. Part time jobs from home are largely adopted by the mothers, who wish to get paid funds although staying at their house and likewise searching immediately after their young youngsters as going out of home to function in a workplace can disturb their program existence. Online essay service for you.
The students who want to generate additional capital to fulfill their instructional expenditures are doing part time jobs from home which they are able to easily handle following returning from their school or colleges. But lots of folks, regardless of whether douleur or feminine, are preferring complete time or part time jobs from home as they feel it a fatigue to sit down in a workplace and deal with a boss bossing them around for complete day! Rather they prefer to sit inside the cozy setting of their home, possessing a cup of espresso and operating. There are plenty of part time jobs from home that you simply can opt for from by basically dedicating the time to going on the internet on a consistent basis. You realize that there is too much month for the money from part time jobs from home and which you have stretched your spending budget so thin which you can see suitable part time jobs from home by means of the very poor thing. You pinch pennies so hard that they cower at the bottom of wallets, pockets and purses. You reluctantly confront the details which you have to find a second career, but you will find a couple of harsh realities which you must aspect in. Part time jobs from home make an extra impression for the majority of households for quite a few distinctive factors. Part Time Jobs From HomeHere are why you might take consideration part time jobs from home: Child Care A part-time or second work will mean which you will require extra kid care or will want soon after hour little one treatment. For people who are lucky sufficient part time jobs from home to have a task that will get them household before or soon immediately after their children, little one care fees may not be a problem but for those who factor inside a second or portion time task, which will change. Part time jobs from home eliminates the need for child treatment costs in any respect. In addition, it provides you the chance to be there together with your child, even though you’re creating extra dollars from part time work from home jobs make you loved it. Much less Put on and Tear on your Vehicle Your main occupation is in an office within the uptown location of your neighborhood. You’re taking a second, part time task which is not in an office and part time jobs from home are also situated inside the extra downtown, commercial area of town which is twenty minutes in the opposite direction. On a typical day, you may have to leave your workplace, generate residence, alter apparel, get back again inside the auto and drive to your other occupation. Part time jobs from home guarantees which you are home with no additional driving to a second place needed. Top Interview Questions #7: Do You Have Any Questions For Me?
Believe it or not, this is a very important one of the top interview questions. You really have to have answers for this. It will probably be the last of the top interview questions you’ll be asked and most job applicants will say “No”. But think about it. If you were the interviewer and an applicant had a question or two that demonstrated they knew something about your company or about the industry wouldn’t you be impressed? The interviewer is expecting you to say “No”. Surprise them. They have spent hours and hours asking the same top interview questions to maybe dozens of applicants and it will be refreshing for them to do the answering for a change. This will really make you stand out from the others. Your question of them cannot be about you! Do not ask such questions as: “When would I get a raise?” or “What about vacation time?” It has to be about them/their Company. Ask something like: “Do you feel it’s possible for us to directly compete with (one of their top competitors)?” And then follow that up with: “I would definitely like to be a part of that challenge…Do you think my position here can play an important role in that?” FINAL THOUGHTS Sometimes, the interview process is influenced by your correctly prepared resume,“psychometrics”, body language and even handwriting analysis. Don’t be concerned about it. Just be as relaxed as possible and straightforward with your answers to the top interview questions. Do not fidget, squirm, or have your eyes darting all over the room during the interview. You’re not going to be able to talk your way into the job. You and the job position are a good fit or you’re not. So, let it go and just be yourself. PS: It never hurts to smile a lot too! Smiling can subconsciously set your internal tone to ace these top interview questions! Top Interview Questions #4: What Are Your Weaknesses?
This is often one of the top interview questions and comes from psycho-metrics compiled by psychologists for job interviewers. For some reason they feel it’s important to try and trip up the applicant or to see if the applicant has a good understanding of themselves. Of course this is ridiculous, but you need to be prepared for as many top interview questions as possible. So, do the same thing here as you did with your strengths and be honest with yourself because what you feel is a weakness may be perceived as a strength to an employer. For example, if you glance over your employment history, you may see that you tend to care too much about your job and you therefore work harder than required, which takes you away more than you would like from your social life or family. Yeah, that could be a negative for you personally, but would an employer necessarily see it that way? Is working hard and caring a weakness or a strength? Top Interview Questions #5: Where Do You Want To Be In 5 Years? . Obviously, the purpose of #5 of the top interview questions is to see how purposeful your life is. The interviewer wants to accomplish 2 things here. They want to see whether or not you have direction and responsibility in your life and they want to get an idea of how stable you will be as an employee. The company will be making a significant investment in you both in time and in money if they hire you. Will that investment pay off for them? You need to think about this and have a legitimate answer. Top Interview Questions #6: Why Should I Hire You? A really stupid question. That’s for them to answer for themselves, isn’t it? But, there’s a good chance you will be asked this one of the top interview questions because psychologists have determined it’s a good question and interviewers think it’s clever to ask it and companies they admire ask it, so they are going to ask it too! You should say something like: “Because you want somebody who can competently fill the position and who you won’t have to baby-sit…someone who won’t be here today and gone tomorrow.” That sounds a little bit smart-ass, but it really does answer the question. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
November 2017
Categories |